Search...

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

December 7, 2018 | 5 Mins Read

Weighing Advantages and Obstacles of the Contingent Workforce Model

December 7, 2018 | 5 Mins Read

Weighing Advantages and Obstacles of the Contingent Workforce Model

Share

By Sarah Nicastro, Creator, Future of Field Service

Few of my conversations with field service leaders over the past year haven’t touched on the immense struggle of recruiting and hiring field technicians. In all service verticals, but particularly those more mechanical in nature versus technical in nature, the lack of capable and willing labor is keeping people up at night. As such, some organizations are turning to a contingent workforce model to supplement their internal teams. Other companies that are introducing new service offerings are leveraging a contracted workforce as a way to push into new service areas.

When asked to summarize the biggest value proposition of leveraging a contingent workforce, Tom Paquin, Research Analyst, Service Management at Aberdeen says, “In a sentence: Contingent labor  helps firms mitigate labor shortages and quickly enter new service markets. For that to work, of course, it needs to be coupled with the appropriate technologies and systems of oversight.”

According to Aberdeen’s latest research, there has been a substantial leap in the use of contingent workers by service organizations over the last few years. “Our most recent study put the current share of overall contracted technicians at over 25 percent,” says Paquin. “We can track a few different reasons why this is happening. One major contributor is the fact that technician turnover continues to rise. Aberdeen’s recent study has shown an average turnover rate of 32 percent, and what comes along with it is a dramatic loss of technical know-how, on-the-job experience, and understanding of the industry landscape. Many firms are struggling to ramp up new technicians quickly enough, so the logical choice is to turn to independent entities who understand the space, and the challenges, though are not necessarily experts on the product.”

Paquin notes that an area of particular interest in contracted labor is among warranty services and OEMs. “These are often firms with no previous formal service organization who are looking for ways to build one. Contingent employees, when leveraged correctly, provide a fast-track to servitization. More warranty firms and OEMs are getting to the point where they realize that they need to either break into or start having greater oversight into service,” he says. “Thirty-seven percent of firms in those two categories have indicated that they’re looking to create new as-a-service options for customers this year. Which makes sense—rather than have an independent entity servicing a customer’s boiler, for example, you manage a contractor network and can then send that same person out. They’re certified by you, and you collect a little extra revenue. You go from having zero oversight into how your products are being serviced to owning the entire experience, with minimal ramp-up. What’s not to like? The hardest part is courting the contractor network.

 While the appeal of contingent workers to organizations that don’t already manage service in-house is obvious, the use of contracted labor can be a harder sell for organizations that have traditionally managed all service in-house. Some of this hesitancy may simply be fear of change, but Paquin points out certain scenarios in which caution is suggested. “Any organization with delicate proprietary technology would do best to ramp up their team in-house, as there are naturally challenges involved while working with contractors on specific, complex technologies,” he says. “Cable companies are the most obvious example, though a small few do have contracted labor. The question there is—do you want a contractor servicing your equipment, when your equipment requires extensive back-end access to your systems and you know that their next job might be down the street, servicing equipment for your competitor? Beyond that, any industry with strict environmental, health, and safety regulations have much higher barriers to entry for deploying a contingent workforce.”

How Can Technology Ease Contingent Labor Concerns?

For organizations that have historically handled all service in-house and are uncomfortable with the idea of contracted workers, researching technologies that enable greater visibility and control is recommended. “The big question is: How can you control the quality of your service engagements with people that you don’t directly employ?” says Paquin. “Addressing that problem is part of the reason contingent employee adoption is on the rise today. That control challenge is mitigated by the slew of field service management technologies designed to ‘connect the dots’ and provide a seamless relationship between the firm, internal techs, and contracted technicians. In fact, firms with higher-than-average percentages of contingent employees see much higher rates of year-over-year improvement in time from ticket to invoice, overall technician efficiency, and service contract renewals. Businesses move slowly, especially when they’re entrenched in a traditional engagement model, but when you’re ready to make the adjustment, there are a great deal of safety nets in place, and the ROI is tangible.

 So, what technologies play the biggest role in the successful utilization of contingent labor? “There are dozens and dozens of technologies that make the transition to a contingent workforce more effective, from unified parts management to augmented reality, but really there are three that loom largest: A robust, full-featured field service management solution, strong fleet management, and integration from third-party management utilities,” says Paquin. “If you’re considering contingent employees at all, you owe it to yourself to make sure that your field service technologies have the capabilities to support them, both in terms of built-in processes, as well as the ability to integrate effectively with other tools.”

Whether you’re an organization that is ready to embrace contracted labor or one that has a laundry list of concerns, it is important to recognize the evolving landscape of labor and to consider how continued changes will have to factor in to your labor strategy. “Set aside service for a moment and realize that, in any industry, more and more young people are going to work for themselves. Couple that with fewer technical programs and apprenticeships being offered and the sad truth remains: Today’s full-time technician shortages are not going to dissipate. Organizations are going to have to be more nimble with fewer employees, and contingent labor is proving itself to be an capable utility to help them do so,” concludes Paquin.

December 7, 2018 | 5 Mins Read

The Secret To Markem-Imaje’s Digital Transformation Success

December 7, 2018 | 5 Mins Read

The Secret To Markem-Imaje’s Digital Transformation Success

Share

By Sarah Nicastro, Creator, Future of Field Service

Spoiler alert: there’s no secret. Success in digital transformation comes from a lot of hard work. Sadly, many organizations either don’t realize the legwork that goes into digital transformation or think they can cut corners without feeling the impact. As Jack Rijnenberg, director of global customer service at Markem-Imaje will attest to, the only true path to a successful digital transformation is through the hard work – you can’t cut around it. Markem-Imaje is a Dover Corporation company that specializes in printing and marking technology. The company operates in 30 countries direct, employs more than 3,000, and has a team of 700 field technicians. Markem-Imaje’s customers include Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Coca-Cola, and Pepsico. The company’s field technicians provide a combination of installation, training, break-fix, contract repair, and presales support services.

Rijnenberg recently led the company through the major undertaking of standardizing its field service processes and technologies worldwide. Markem-Imaje had the foresight to realize that to be successful in its business transformation efforts, it needed to first completely review and reshape its existing service processes to make sure they were the most effective and efficient possible (and make changes to them where needed). In talking with Rijnenberg, it is clear that the effort Markem-Imaje put into its people and processes before layering on technology was the key to its successful digital transformation. Here Rijnenberg shares his experience in what it takes to set yourself up for digital transformation success.

Nicastro: When you first determined the need to standardize and automate your service operations, where did you begin in terms of scoping the project and determining the appropriate sequence of events?

Rijnenberg: The first driver of our field automation project was the significant amount of time our field engineers spent doing administrative work following their on-site service jobs (closing service orders, replenishing their car stock, etc.) and, moreover, the delay this administrative work brought to the speed of invoicing and thus cash flow. With the need identified, we started by defining what “good” would look like to us, as well as setting KPIs to measure our progress and success. We considered questions such as what is our service value proposition, how do we want to deliver service, and what is the value in automation to our internal stakeholders. As we answered those questions, we worked to evaluate our current state and determine the gaps we needed to close to achieve our target or desired state. These gaps from current processes to targeted outcomes differed between regions and operations, so we had to develop some individual action plans and accompany all of our action plans with a tight change management strategy.

Nicastro: What were some of the steps you needed to take as a business before even beginning to evaluate technology choices?

Rijnenberg: I would say that the most important step was to get alignment and agreement among with the company’s top management on the business case.

Nicastro: Explain your process review/evaluation, and why you feel it was ultimately critical to the project’s success.

Rijnenberg: The key factor of our success has been the work we put into the harmonization/standardization of our service delivery processes worldwide (over 35 countries). The implementation, training on, and maintenance of a field service automation tool would be an impossible challenge without having done this initial “legwork.” We have spent a large amount of time in service process change management. This started first in an effort to get a worldwide agreement on what the future state of our processes would be, and was followed by individual action plans because all operations started from a different process baseline.

Nicastro: Upon completing that review and identifying areas that needed addressed, what were the next steps for standardizing and optimizing the processes?

Rijnenberg: We first created the blueprint together with the main process owners, then worked to design the FSE tool. We completed a pilot for six months and made required adjustments and modifications from the learnings during the pilot. Next we trained super users in the regions and countries, simultaneously on the new processes and automation tool. We then started a phased rollout training users in the countries on the optimized processes and technology. We now conduct user surveys every six months as part of our ongoing change management strategy.

Nicastro: You’ve talked with peers that feel as though their technology investment has failed them, when in reality they didn’t adequately prepare BEFORE layering on technology. What’s your opinion on why this happens and practical advice for someone just starting out to avoid the headaches this oversight causes? 

Rijnenberg: The key factors of success in this type of service transformation project are, first, standardize and optimize your processes before adding technology. Second, make sure your stakeholders and users fully understand what they will get (and won’t get) with the tool you’ve selected. And lastly, ensure you are providing strong support in deployment phase (between business owners, internal ICT, and your FSA partner).

Nicastro: Let’s talk about the people aspect of this. This effort was a MAJOR change. Many countries/regions were changing how they had been conducting business. Everyone was introduced to new technology. How did you handle such a change in culture – what change management, training, and communication methods did you use? What role do you feel these played in the success of your project?

Rijnenberg: Change management plays a critical role and having a sound strategy is imperative. For each of the process steps, we determined if there would be a change related to four areas: tool, activity, culture, or organization. This exercise helped us to determine where we were introducing change and could anticipate potential issues, and preemptively develop a strategy for bridging those gaps. Overall, I will say that our FSEs have been eager to receive an automated tool because they all welcomed the ease it would bring to their jobs in terms of administration, having access to information at their fingertips to do a better job onsite, and gaining the ability to better collaborate with their peers. So in that sense, the change management of implementing the technology itself was relatively easy.

Nicastro: What other thoughts or advice can you provide for a peer on why it’s worth it to slow down and do a project like this right?

Rijnenberg: You obviously never have enough time to implement and are under pressure, but I would strongly advise when setting priorities and areas of focus never to assume things. It is so important to take the time to get a clear picture of the current state in each operation, compare this with your desired future state, and develop your roadmap from there.

Most Recent

December 7, 2018 | 4 Mins Read

Best Practices In Service Parts Logistics

December 7, 2018 | 4 Mins Read

Best Practices In Service Parts Logistics

Share

By Micheal Blumberg

Service Parts Logistics Management represents the largest investment and second largest operating expense within an Aftermarket Service or Field Service Organization (FSO). Service parts also represents one of the most critical resources required for ensuring high first-time fix rates and recurring revenue. Therefore, anything that a FSO can do to improve the productivity, efficiency, or quality of the service parts logistics pipeline will have a dramatic positive impact of financial performance and customer satisfaction.

To understand where and how to improve service parts management, let’s first examine critical operational issues that impact financial performance of the service parts function. Our research indicates that 60 to 75 percent of all service requests require spare parts to resolve the issues.  As a result, an FSO is likely to experience low inventory fill rates and/or low first-time fix rates if they do not have adequate systems or procedures in place to ensure parts availability where and when needed.

Another issue is that nearly 50 percent of the value of an FSO’s parts inventory can be found below manned parts depots or warehouses (i.e., vans/trunks, branch offices, or consigned to the customer site). The problem is that many FSOs don’t know exactly where this inventory is located or what the dollar value is at each location. Without this understanding, FSOs run the risk of having too much inventory in manned warehouses to compensate for their lack of information.

Before you click away, disappointed that I brought up something as practical and boring as time management, hear me out. My intent is not to crush your spirits.

One reason why spare parts are often located below manned warehouses is because the FSO has not implemented the appropriate controls to track these parts. Another is because the parts have not been returned through the FSO’s reverse logistics and/or depot repair operations when it is deemed defective or no longer required. Approximately 80 percent of the value of spare parts in the logistics pipeline fall into this category. However, it is also important to consider that 30 to 35 percent of parts returned to depot repair operations are actually good parts. The reason they are returned, if at all, is because either the FSO’s FSE misdiagnosed the problem or used the spare part as a test procedure. In other words, replacing a spare part in a problem unit to determine if the problem is indeed due to a defective spare part.      

Navigating The Complexity Of Spare Parts Management

As a result of these issues, spare parts management becomes a complex task. Having too many spare parts on hand can have a negative impact on the balance sheet and income statement; too few parts can result in degradation of service quality and customer satisfaction. Fortunately, there are several best practices that FSOs can implement to avoid these challenges. These include: 

  • Track and control spare parts: FSOs can utilize bar codes, RFID, and blockchain to track and control the volume and value of spare parts in all stocking locations whether manned or unmanned.
  • Leverage IT Infrastructure: Utilizing enterprise management systems and best of breed software solutions to manage, plan, forecast, and coordinate spare parts inventory can have a dramatic positive impact on improving first-time fix rates and inventory availability levels.
  • Expedite delivery to reduce logistics investment: By moving toward same-day or next-day parts delivery and storing spare parts in Forward Stocking Locations (FSL) that serve multiple FSEs or customer sites, an FSO can significantly lower their investment in spare parts.
  • Improve front-end diagnostics: Implementing remote support and IoT solutions to identify the problem, symptom, and root cause of a problem prior to dispatch will increase the probability that the FSE has the right part on hand and that he/she does not utilize spare parts as a form of test equipment.
  • Advance Depot Repair Operations: Transforming depot repair activities from a job shop to assembly line function, implementing test and screening procedures pre- and post-repair, and performing these functions in FSLs and Regional Return Centers will improve spare parts velocity (i.e., cycle) time and reduce inventory stocking level requirements.

Benchmark research by Blumberg Advisory indicates that significant improvements in efficiency and productivity can be achieved by implementing the strategies identified above. The average percentage improvement by key performance indicator is as follows:

By implementing these best practices, FSOs will also find they operate a stronger balance sheet, healthier profit margins, and higher levels of customer satisfaction. These strategies all have several things in common, namely a heavy reliance on data, technology (i.e., information systems), and process improvements. 

Companies that operate asset-intensive field service operations, in other words those that maintain a high investment in spare parts, should give serious consideration to implementing the strategies identified above. This requires that FSOs examine how well their internal logistics management systems align with the state of the art, as well as assess the impact these systems have on KPIs related to Service Parts Management. In other words, conduct a benchmark evaluation of these systems, process, and KPIs against industry standards and best in class performance.

To learn more about Service Parts benchmarks and best practices check out Blumberg Advisory Group’s Operational Excellence consulting practice at https://blumberg-advisor.com/operational-excellence/

Most Recent

December 7, 2018 | 3 Mins Read

3 Essential Characteristics Of Self-Service

December 7, 2018 | 3 Mins Read

3 Essential Characteristics Of Self-Service

Share

By Sarah Nicastro, Creator, Future of Field Service

I was reading a Forrester 2019 Customer Experience (CX) predictions blog last week and this quote stuck out to me, “Meanwhile, customer expectations have been rising slowly but steadily. In the current favorable economy, it’s likely that this movement will continue, pressuring firms to improve CX just to keep from falling back even further. It’s like what the Red Queen said in Through the Looking-Glass: ‘. . . it takes all the running you can do, to keep in the same place.’”

While many field service organizations may feel they are running in place with their efforts to advance CX, it is important to keep the forward motion. As you work to further your CX initiatives, self-service is a critical topic. You can’t provide a stellar CX without strong self-service capabilities, and the demand from your customers to take control of their service experiences is only going to increase.

I spoke recently with Aly Pinder Jr, Program Director, Service Innovation & Connected Products at IDC Manufacturing Insights about what he feels 2019 will bring, and the expansion of self-service offerings quickly came up. “I believe customers will play a bigger role in their own service experiences. Customer portals will go beyond an FAQ tab to empower the customer to interact with the service organization, peers, or even the front-line technician. This added access will transform the relationship between the customer and service organization, adding visibility, value, and a bond that will be tougher to break by a competitor,” he says.

So, what is important to your customers with regard to self-service, and why? Here are three general areas in which you need to ensure you are meeting ever-increasing demands and empowering your customer-base.

  • Seamlessness: Customers want to be able to reach you when they want, how they want. If they call, they want someone to answer. If they prefer mobile, they want to be able to communicate through an app. Some like email while others choose chat. The goal is to be there when they need you, in whatever way they want to reach you. And, most importantly, to ensure that interactions are captured and communicated company-wide so that customers don’t have to repeat themselves or do redundant work.
  • Control: Customers want to be able to take matters into their own hands. In today’s tech-savvy culture, most customers won’t tolerate having to call and wait on hold to schedule an appointment. They want to be able to log on to a portal or use an app to schedule and modify appointments themselves. Self-scheduling is a must-have capability. Customers also want the ability to view information about their account and service history, to make changes to preferences or appointments as needed, and to view information on additional/alternative products and services at their leisure.
  • Real-Time Insight: As consumers, we are so accustomed to being able to access any information we need at any time. From a service perspective, providing the ability for your customers to peruse their account information, history, and scheduled appointments is only step one – but that’s just the beginning. You should also be considering how to provide customers with real-time updates on scheduled appointments, technician details and arrival time, and immediate access to the service summary and invoice upon completion. IoT presents another opportunity to provide real-time information to customers on equipment you’re servicing, and this data is often valuable enough that you can leverage it to increase service revenue.

There are a wealth of solutions available to you today that can help you deliver on your customers’ self-service demands by augmenting your customer service function. Making the investment in strong self-service capabilities is worthwhile, and arguably essential. Your investment will pay off in higher customer satisfaction and NPS scores, as well as providing a competitive edge if you can deliver a truly seamless experience that provides the control and insights your customers are seeking.

Most Recent

December 6, 2018 | 7 Mins Read

Strong Leadership: The Anchor In a Sea of Field Service Change

December 6, 2018 | 7 Mins Read

Strong Leadership: The Anchor In a Sea of Field Service Change

Share

By Sarah Nicastro, Creator, Future of Field Service

Bob Latvis has a long history in field service. He started as a field technician at Cox Communications more than 30 years ago and worked his way up through the ranks to serve as the Regional VP of Field Operations at Cox before taking a role as the Regional VP of Technical Operations at Comcast Cable. As a leader within these organizations, Latvis has always focused on being accessible and authentic – traits that have contributed to his success in leading these organizations through decades of change.

Change abounds in the field service space – we’re witnessing an evolution in the delivery of service, rapid changes in customer demands, technology advancements that allow for a brand-new way of operating, a younger generation of technicians coming into play, and much more. All these changes are exciting, but they each present their own challenges. In such a transformative time, strong and effective leadership in field service has never been more important.

What constitutes strong leadership? Latvis and I discussed three key characteristics that he feels constitute strong field service leadership.

Maintain an Employee-First Mentality

The first step in increasing your relatability and authenticity is to have a really strong awareness of and appreciation for what’s going on across the entire business. “I’ve found that it’s helpful to stay current with what is happening in peripheral departments,” says Latvis.

For instance, there is great benefit for the field service leader to attend a marketing team meeting, or to have regular one-on-one meetings with finance or supply chain. Seeking out perspective on how other departments are approaching their business challenges helps to enhance your broader perspective as well as observe how other leaders lead.

Latvis also points out the importance of humility and argues that you can’t be relatable without a heavy dose of it. “In order to be a successful leader, you have to show humility. If you’re the VP coming into a room full of technicians, be humble. Be willing to listen and not be the biggest voice in the room. Just be there as a sponge. Think of it as asking for help in your own development. Employees will embrace that vulnerability. You don’t have to have street credibility; you can build your credibility up by saying, ‘I need your help to be successful.’”

Consider how building your relatability and authenticity will enable you to get closer to your employees, which will in turn help you to improve your operations. “When you’re relatable and your team is comfortable approaching you, they can really help you solve your business problems and define your business strategy. Remember, your frontline employees have a direct pipeline to your customers; they see them every day and talk to them every day — they are gold mines of information. If they don’t feel you’re approachable or relatable, they may see four or five things that could really improve your business but not approach you because they are afraid you would take that as criticism versus ‘Wow, your idea could really save us time, save us money, could improve our customer satisfaction.’”

Latvis suggests keeping in mind the difference between compliance and commitment. “Anyone can create a compliant work environment but doing so will give you the bare minimum of performance. If you work toward creating a committed environment, you’ll get much more because people are committed to doing a great job versus just compliant to doing the bare minimum,” he says.

Other important aspects of relatability and authenticity are speaking in your own voice and always, always being honest. “Speak in your own voice that is recognized as authentic and not scripted,” suggests Latvis. “Communications experts are wonderful at crafting effective messaging, but if it doesn’t sound like something that a person would normally say, credibility can be lost. When folks feel that you are being honest with them, whether they agree with the message or not, it’s accepted much better. If you aren’t transparent in your communication, you leave room for speculation and suspicion.”

The final key to relatability is accessibility. “You have to make yourself accessible. I’m a realist – I understand the email box is filling up left and right, you’ve got your financial statements you need to look over, and you have your business priorities you need to track down. But you have to make yourself accessible, so people see you as somebody that is really invested in them and their job experience.”

Maintain an Employee-First Mentality

Customer experience is top of mind for today’s service organizations, but Latvis suggests you keep in mind that engaged employees are required for a positive customer experience. Therefore, it is important as a leader to maintain an employee-first mentality and to work tirelessly to ensure your employees are engaged and satisfied. “Companies can easily fall into a trap of overlooking employee satisfaction. The perception is often ‘you’re paid to do your job, so just do your job.’ Too much emphasis is put on the extrinsic motivation or compensation — and companies feel the techs should be happy just with what they’re getting paid. Not enough effort is put into empathy, the appreciation of the skill it takes to do their job, and focus on the mutual purpose that you serve,” says Latvis. “We all serve the customer, and from what I’ve seen, when technicians see that the senior leadership is engaged at that level, they know that their going the extra mile makes a difference. Rather than the mindset of ‘Hey, you’re getting paid well. Just do your job,’ it should be, ‘I care about you as a human being, and I want you to be successful.’”

Investing in one-on-ones is a great way to keep employees connected and engaged. “It shows that the leader is engaged in that employee’s continued development, whether that’s into leadership, to make them more technically astute or competent, increasing their financial acumen, or making them a more marketable employee. Having an individual development plan increases employee engagement and shows that the company is invested in the employee’s future. Time put into one-on-ones is a demonstration that you want your employees to build a long-term career with you. The secondary benefit is that it also allows the identification of talent for succession planning.”

Keep in mind that one-on-ones aren’t always possible or practical. While they are a great goal to strive for, the most important thing is to ensure you are staying engaged with your workforce. “The field service workforce is evolving into a more real-time, virtual environment.  This means you can leverage tools like message boards, group text, chat, email and SharePoint to stay connected and augment your face-to-face interactions.”

Take an Active Approach in Managing Change

In a time of great change, much responsibility falls on field service leaders to ensure employees remain informed, comfortable, and confident. Change naturally causes an anxious response, and a good leader can act as a calming force in the face of change. According to Latvis, transparency is the golden rule. “Transparency is the key. Be honest with your workforce. Explaining the ‘why’ behind the change is essential. Without ample explanation, folks will be left to guesswork which leads to increased stress around the change as well as assumptions and conclusions that aren’t always accurate.”

As you’re communicating around change, keep these tips in mind. “Ensure your team knows that you understand that change can be difficult - show empathy and not intolerance. Always emphasize the ways in which this change will help the employees you’re communicating it to – they will be more receptive to change that will impact them personally in a positive manner. And keep your communications short and sweet – don’t overwhelm people with too much dialogue,” suggests Latvis.

Involving your employees in projects from the beginning is important in promoting acceptance. “It has been my experience that pulling employees into the process has a tremendous upside. For instance, holding focus groups or feedback sessions to solicit how to best approach a change to the business are excellent tools to not only gather valuable input but to help obtain buy-in early on. There is great credibility that is available when you share that employees had feedback into the change,” says Latvis.

If you choose to involve your employees, which you should, it is imperative that you make sure they feel their input and feedback is valued. “You have to be sure employee feedback is acted upon. Keep an action item list and, as questions come up, documented them along with who owns the follow-up and the date by which you’ll close the loop,” says Latvis. “This process ensures you maintain credibility. Whether it’s an answer people want to hear or not, commit to following through and your employees respect that. If you ask for feedback and don’t follow through, the next time you find the room shuts down. When you really need their feedback, people will think, ‘Why bother? Nobody’s listening anyway.’”

Most Recent

December 6, 2018 | 3 Mins Read

IoT Is The Foundation Of Next-Generation Field Service Management

December 6, 2018 | 3 Mins Read

IoT Is The Foundation Of Next-Generation Field Service Management

Share

By Bill Pollock

The global Field Service Management (FSM) segment has reinvented itself several times over the years, from break/fix, to network services, to software support, to predictive diagnostics, and more. However, the introduction of the Internet of Things (IoT) is having a much greater and more profound impact on the global services community than anything that has preceded it.

FSOs will be increasingly behind the technology curve if they do not leverage IoT-powered FSM capabilities – or at least engage a primary FSM solution provider that does. The IoT is quickly becoming the chief differentiator that divides those FSOs that can meet the challenges of the present, let alone the future; from those that cannot.

Mobile technologies can also make an FSO’s business analytics capabilities much more vibrant. What good does it do to collect real-time data if you can’t share it in real time? A full-bodied mobility platform can improve any FSO’s “velocity of service” by shaving off days, if not weeks, of delays and potential paper-based mistakes. Having the IoT generate data in real time without the means to get that relevant data and information out to the field in real time is a big mistake. The combination of the IoT and mobility is powerful.

Through the use of Augmented Reality (AR) apps, now actively being combined with Virtual Reality (VR) to form a more complex and robust “Mixed Reality” (MR) capability, we are likely to see even more advances that will ultimately reduce the cost of performing service – for both on-site and remote repairs – over time. Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) will also play a part.

Without the IoT, there can be no predictive diagnostics; there could be no AR, VR or MR. Cloud-based FSM solutions leveled the playing field across all services industry segments, the now the IoT is taking this a step further.

Even the core aspects of FSM have evolved. A standard scheduling functionality is simply not doing the job anymore for many FSOs, and many have set their sights on solution providers that can offer optimized scheduling. The same applies to standard business analytics versus advanced analytics, as well as for the various components of spare parts and inventory management. In fact, what used to be “passable” in the past, now looks a little bit “dusty” and, as such, FSOs are seeking more robust functionalities made possible through the integration of the IoT into FSM.

Soon there will also be an entirely new way of collecting data and reporting KPIs as a result of remote diagnostics, AR, and the growing influence of the IoT. It will be analogous to keeping two sets of books – that is, one set of KPIs (like Mean Time to Repair, Elapsed Time from Problem Identification to Correction, etc.) for the way service has historically been performed (i.e., having a field tech dispatched on-site), versus the “new” way, led by remote diagnostics and repair. These methods will need to be measured, monitored, and tracked separately.

The future of Field Service Management is already here! By scoping out how the global services community is evolving, at what pace, with which technologies, FSOs can plan to adapt to the multitude of changes that have occurred and those that are coming.

For more information on this topic, please feel free to download a complimentary copy of the companion Analysts Take paper here.

Bill Pollock is President & Principal Consulting Analyst at Strategies For GrowthSM (SFGSM), the independent research analyst and consulting firm he founded in 1992. Bill is a prolific author and speaker on all things service, and a long-time contributor to the industry’s leading trade publications and conferences. For more information, Bill may be reached at (610) 399-9717, or via email at wkp@s4growth.com. Bill’s blog is accessible at www.PollockOnService.com and via Twitter at www.twitter.com/SFGOnService.

Most Recent